Marketing Prose: Articles that give insight into issues facing businesses today.

What a Brand is Not

A brand’s distinction is whatever separates it from its competitors, makes it stand out as extraordinary or different or, better yet, more valuable to the end user.

For those of us who are specialists in brand development, it is disheartening to listen to all the brand-speak.

There is much confusion in the marketplace as to what a brand is. If you’re not sure you understand all the brand stuff you’re hearing and seeing, we offer our understanding. There are too many unqualified brand experts out there—agencies included. They are part of the cause of much of the confusion.

Let us start with the obvious. Brand is not a logo, an advertising tag line or design elements. According to Webster’s, a brand is a “claim of distinction.” To certified brand specialists, a brand is “an undisputable, evidence of distinction” and something that can be proved.

And, although the words are used interchangeably, there is also a difference between “branding” and “brand development.” Branding being the tactics used to deliver a brand’s distinction and brand development being the discovery process used to unearth a brand’s distinction.

We witness “branding” as the Holy Grail for most advertisers and the specialty of many agencies. Again we wonder. There have been all kinds of great and correct brand development and branding examples to reference and clear up the mystery, just look around! Disney, Maytag, Apple, and many more incredibly brilliant brand case histories. Still, there’s confusion.

Remember, the definition of a brand is, “An evidence of distinction.” To uncover that distinction requires a process of discovery, not an ad campaign. At least, not yet. Branding tactics are the consistent use of color, graphics, and spokespeople used in the communication of a brand’s distinction. But, please, don’t think that the color, graphics or spokesperson is the distinction. Those could change with the next campaign. No, a brand’s distinction is whatever separates it from its competitors, makes it stand out as extraordinary or different or, better yet, more valuable to the end user.

An example of brand development and branding done right is Maytag. Maytag’s evidence of distinction is, “our machines won’t break down.” How is that communicated? The loneliest repairman delivers the message to you. Maytag’s distinction is higher quality and it’s obvious. Without any brand value like Maytag’s a competing manufacturer’s only measure of value becomes price.

Again, you can see the need for brand development or a discovery process. Without it, the branding tactics are simply communicating the consistent use of color, graphics and spokespeople. And that is what a brand is not.

4 Responses to “What a Brand is Not”

  1. Augen lasern says:

    Hi, i noticed your blog in the 7 am radioshow on pandora radio Dallas, these people presented a show all-around blogging and web 2.0. Immediately after that radioshow i’ll sally to your posting about What a Brand is Not Brand Pro Blog. Nice post mate! I hits the point – Its good to look at just one single blogger out of quite a few i checked out who understands that what he is writing about! Keep on your way.

  2. I saw this really great post today!

  3. Nice post…Thank you for sharing some good things.

  4. Lise says:

    Nice blog here! Also your website loads up fast! What host are you using? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

Leave a Reply